« Home | Ministry of Labour & Social Security PATH has ... » | 07-13-2006 Sustainable tourism practiced in St... » | International experts to address economic symposi... » | Thursday, July 13, 2006 - Philipsburg, St. Maart... » | Afro Descendants in the Hemisphere: Issues and Pr... » | July 12, 2006, 7:28PM IMF Team to Tour Eastern Ca... » | Ethics and Development INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPM... » | First Intensive Course in Latin America and the ... » | Millennium Development Goals 2006 Progress Chart ... » | Domlec Funds Environmental Care Project The two ... » 

Friday, July 14, 2006 




Redistributing Income to the Poor and the Rich: Public Transfers in Latin America and the Caribbean

This study measures the extent to which publicly-subsidized transfers in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) redistribute income. The redistributive power of 56 transfers in eight countries is measured by their coverage, size, absolute incidence, simulated impacts on poverty and inequality, and by their distributional characteristic, a statistic derived from taxation literature.

The findings suggest that public transfers can be effective instruments to redistribute income to the poor. Yet frequently they have not managed to do so. Indeed, Robin Hood works in both directions in LAC, with public transfers redistributing income to both the rich and the poor. The redistributive impacts from social insurance are limited – and even regressive in some countries. This regressivity derives from two main design factors: a truncation in coverage due to requirements of membership in formal labor markets which exclude the majority of the poor, and highly generous unit benefits for those in the upper quintiles. Moreover, this regressivity applies to net social insurance transfers, which are subsidized by government budgets at the expense of all taxpayers. The more recent emergence of social assistance only partially offsets this historical “truncation” of public transfers in LAC. Despite coverage and distributional patterns that favor the poor, small unit subsidies limit the redistributive, poverty and inequality impacts of even the most targeted social assistance programs. We also find considerable variation among social assistance programs, with many food-based programs and scholarships being regressive. Governments should reconsider these programs – or at least strengthen their design. They could look to the targeting mechanisms used by conditional cash transfers – with impressive rewards for progressivity.


The Report by
Kathy Lindert;
Emmanuel Skoufias;
Joseph Shapiro

- M
arch 30th 2006

Complete Report


© 2006 The World Bank Group , All Rights Reserved.

Links to this post

Create a Link

About me

  • I'm Em Asomba
  • From United States
My profile
Skype Me™!

Poverty & Social Development: A Caribbean Perspective is powered by Blogspot and Gecko & Fly.
No part of the content or the blog may be reproduced without prior written permission.
Join the Google Adsense program and learn how to make money online.